<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lessons Learned from Bitch Magazine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thelearnedfangirl.com/2008/09/22/lessons-learned-from-bitch-magazine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thelearnedfangirl.com/2008/09/22/lessons-learned-from-bitch-magazine/</link>
	<description>a critical take on online culture and social media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 18:33:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: M-shel</title>
		<link>http://thelearnedfangirl.com/2008/09/22/lessons-learned-from-bitch-magazine/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>M-shel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelearnedfangirl.wordpress.com/?p=273#comment-76</guid>
		<description>There were a few specific things that came to mind, for me personally:

1. I think Bitch created (maybe unknowingly) a model that couldn&#039;t be easier to implement, whether you be a NFP, an intramural sports league, a small fundraising group, etc. It&#039;s implementable for everyone IF they just take the time to (as you said) know the market they&#039;re talking to.

2. Because they took such a high-road and didn&#039;t pander to the asshattery of the naysayers, I became even more engaged--and more willing to give money in the future. I WANT that kind of goodwill in my life and it makes me proud to be a Bitch supporter

3. And though this goes slightly against #2, I think Jez shot themselves in the foot a bit with their readership by being so assish about the whole thing, instead of showing the &#039;feminist support&#039; they tout in word, but obvs not in deed. I, for one, have now opted to have nothing to do with them and I was a daily (and avid) reader for quite some time.

4. This, posted in Jez&#039;s article, is a misnomer &quot;but not having to pay taxes must alleviate at least some of that burden&quot; I&#039;m sure Bitch, as with any magazine, relies on their advertising revenue to make the money that keeps the organization running. Advertising revenue for a NFP is considered an unrelated business income tax (UBIT), which means IF they make over a certain dollar amount then that revenue stream becomes taxable.  Now, I don&#039;t know if they&#039;re at that point, but it&#039;s bad journalism and just blatant disregard to for Slutmachine to make such a statement without the knowledge to back it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There were a few specific things that came to mind, for me personally:</p>
<p>1. I think Bitch created (maybe unknowingly) a model that couldn&#8217;t be easier to implement, whether you be a NFP, an intramural sports league, a small fundraising group, etc. It&#8217;s implementable for everyone IF they just take the time to (as you said) know the market they&#8217;re talking to.</p>
<p>2. Because they took such a high-road and didn&#8217;t pander to the asshattery of the naysayers, I became even more engaged&#8211;and more willing to give money in the future. I WANT that kind of goodwill in my life and it makes me proud to be a Bitch supporter</p>
<p>3. And though this goes slightly against #2, I think Jez shot themselves in the foot a bit with their readership by being so assish about the whole thing, instead of showing the &#8216;feminist support&#8217; they tout in word, but obvs not in deed. I, for one, have now opted to have nothing to do with them and I was a daily (and avid) reader for quite some time.</p>
<p>4. This, posted in Jez&#8217;s article, is a misnomer &#8220;but not having to pay taxes must alleviate at least some of that burden&#8221; I&#8217;m sure Bitch, as with any magazine, relies on their advertising revenue to make the money that keeps the organization running. Advertising revenue for a NFP is considered an unrelated business income tax (UBIT), which means IF they make over a certain dollar amount then that revenue stream becomes taxable.  Now, I don&#8217;t know if they&#8217;re at that point, but it&#8217;s bad journalism and just blatant disregard to for Slutmachine to make such a statement without the knowledge to back it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

